Course equivalency management system
The Challenge of Managing Course Equivalencies Offline and Standalone
Course equivalency management practices vary significantly throughout the United States. There are reactive and proactive course assessment practices that feed course equivalency system databases. The assessment practices are influenced by roles, perceptions, volume and orientation. Institutions generally have been impeded by the lack of systematic practices because standalone tools such as Degree Audit and Transfer Articulation are complex and labor intensive to sustain over time. Reviewing past transfer circumstances reveals how a student's prior coursework is assessed and judged based on the characteristics of the source institution. Some measure the student's learning outcomes through assessments tests. Prior learning is not just classroom based, yet seat time is a major factor in comparing courses. Rigor and course quality is viewed through different perspectives and lenses.There are common assessment patterns worth mentioning. Some institutions create and update a course equivalency database as students matriculate and request transfer credit. Transfer decisions are impacted by how the student defends their prior learning and assessment. These decisions transversely impact how courses are marked comparable or likely comparable or unique. The course equivalency or transfer articulation tables are sometimes posted on transfer websites, which offers some level of self-assessment by students prior to enrollment and matriculation. Upon application, transcripts are forwarded to the receiver and are queued for review by transfer specialists who break down the coursework by department, level and perceptions of the source course and institution. Some institutions create course equivalencies following newly published transfer articulation agreements. Some institutions create course equivalencies following the guidelines of state-wide transfer agreements. The joint efforts to align programs of study between senders and receivers are proactive and designed to streamline transfer enrollment steps and lessen the burden on transfer evaluation. Other institutions choose to perform one-off assessments, and they do not track the implications and repeating nature of course assessment.
http://www.academyone.com/products/knowitall-portals/knowitall-portals-features/course-equivalency-management-center
Features of CEMC
- Create and maintain equivalencies
- Make proposals to other institutions and track them
- Increase your direct equivalencies using systematic opportunities
- Manage evaluations that are proposed to your institution and review equivalencies when source institutions update their catalogs
- Create reports and extract your data
- Review course profiles side-by-side
- Send out requests to department heads and other recipients to review the course information
- Specify notes and conditions that will be useful to students
- Save started evaluations to complete at a later date
- Evaluate proposals sent to your institution from another
- Review your direct equivalencies where the source course has been updated due to a new course catalog
- Create a number of reports based on equivalency data and past evaluations. Reports can be exported in Word, Excel, and PDF formats.
As a result, many institutions re-key course information from senders into their systems to retain the record links needed in several places. This duplication of effort adds time to the assessment process, potentially introduces errors and often frustrates students and advisors with delays that impact course planning and enrollment.
The Power of Sharing ONE Solution
AcademyOne's Course Equivalency Management Center (CEMC) is designed to streamline an institution's course assessment process and provide access to course equivalency information for current and prospective students, advisors, faculty and administrators. CEMC is a course equivalency management system that can be used by a community of institutions or a single institution across its departments. Join a community of institutions working together - sharing tools and a course database that accelerates and simplifies course assessment processes.The Challenge of Managing Course Equivalencies Offline and Standalone
Course equivalency management practices vary significantly throughout the United States. There are reactive and proactive course assessment practices that feed course equivalency system databases. The assessment practices are influenced by roles, perceptions, volume and orientation. Institutions generally have been impeded by the lack of systematic practices because standalone tools such as Degree Audit and Transfer Articulation are complex and labor intensive to sustain over time. Reviewing past transfer circumstances reveals how a student's prior coursework is assessed and judged based on the characteristics of the source institution. Some measure the student's learning outcomes through assessments tests. Prior learning is not just classroom based, yet seat time is a major factor in comparing courses. Rigor and course quality is viewed through different perspectives and lenses.There are common assessment patterns worth mentioning. Some institutions create and update a course equivalency database as students matriculate and request transfer credit. Transfer decisions are impacted by how the student defends their prior learning and assessment. These decisions transversely impact how courses are marked comparable or likely comparable or unique. The course equivalency or transfer articulation tables are sometimes posted on transfer websites, which offers some level of self-assessment by students prior to enrollment and matriculation. Upon application, transcripts are forwarded to the receiver and are queued for review by transfer specialists who break down the coursework by department, level and perceptions of the source course and institution. Some institutions create course equivalencies following newly published transfer articulation agreements. Some institutions create course equivalencies following the guidelines of state-wide transfer agreements. The joint efforts to align programs of study between senders and receivers are proactive and designed to streamline transfer enrollment steps and lessen the burden on transfer evaluation. Other institutions choose to perform one-off assessments, and they do not track the implications and repeating nature of course assessment.
Features of CEMC
- Create and maintain equivalencies
- Make proposals to other institutions and track them
- Increase your direct equivalencies using systematic opportunities
- Manage evaluations that are proposed to your institution and review equivalencies when source institutions update their catalogs
- Create reports and extract your data
- Review course profiles side-by-side
- Send out requests to department heads and other recipients to review the course information
- Specify notes and conditions that will be useful to students
- Save started evaluations to complete at a later date
- Evaluate proposals sent to your institution from another
- Review your direct equivalencies where the source course has been updated due to a new course catalog
- Create a number of reports based on equivalency data and past evaluations. Reports can be exported in Word, Excel, and PDF formats.
As a result, many institutions re-key course information from senders into their systems to retain the record links needed in several places. This duplication of effort adds time to the assessment process, potentially introduces errors and often frustrates students and advisors with delays that impact course planning and enrollment.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home